The European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act) establishes a comprehensive legal framework to regulate artificial intelligence technologies within the EU. Below is a glossary of 100 key terms from the AI Act, each accompanied by a detailed description and relevant keywords to enhance understanding and searchability.
1. **Artificial Intelligence (AI):** A branch of computer science focused on creating systems capable of performing tasks that typically require human intelligence, such as learning, reasoning, and problem-solving.
*Keywords:* AI, machine learning, intelligent systems, automation, cognitive computing.
2. **Artificial Intelligence System (AI System):** Any software developed using machine learning, logic-based approaches, or statistical methods that can, for a given set of objectives, generate outputs such as predictions, recommendations, or decisions influencing real or virtual environments.
*Keywords:* AI system, predictive analytics, decision-making algorithms, machine learning models.
3. **Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act):** The European Union’s regulatory framework designed to address the risks associated with AI applications and promote trustworthy AI by imposing obligations based on the level of risk presented by AI systems.
*Keywords:* EU AI regulation, AI governance, AI compliance, European AI law.
4. **High-Risk AI Systems:** AI applications that pose significant threats to health, safety, or fundamental rights, including those used in critical infrastructures, education, employment, essential private and public services, law enforcement, migration, and justice.
*Keywords:* high-risk AI, AI safety, critical AI applications, regulated AI systems.
5. **Unacceptable Risk AI Systems:** AI systems that are prohibited under the AI Act due to their potential to cause harm, such as those that manipulate human behavior, exploit vulnerabilities, or perform social scoring.
*Keywords:* banned AI practices, AI manipulation, social scoring prohibition, AI ethics.
6. **Limited Risk AI Systems:** AI applications that require transparency obligations, ensuring users are aware they are interacting with an AI system, such as chatbots or AI-generated content.
*Keywords:* AI transparency, user awareness, chatbot disclosure, AI-generated content.
7. **Minimal Risk AI Systems:** AI systems that pose little to no risk and are largely exempt from regulation, including applications like AI-enabled video games or spam filters.
*Keywords:* low-risk AI, AI in gaming, spam filter AI, unregulated AI applications.
8. **General-Purpose AI Models:** AI systems designed to perform a wide range of functions, including foundation models like large language models, which may be subject to specific transparency requirements under the AI Act.
*Keywords:* foundation models, large language models, versatile AI systems, AI model transparency.
9. **Biometric Identification:** The automated recognition of individuals based on their biological and behavioral characteristics, such as facial recognition or fingerprint scanning.
*Keywords:* biometric data, facial recognition, fingerprint scanning, identity verification.
10. **Real-Time Biometric Identification:** The immediate processing of biometric data to identify individuals in live settings, often used in surveillance contexts, and subject to strict regulations under the AI Act.
*Keywords:* live biometric scanning, surveillance AI, real-time identification, biometric surveillance.
11. **Remote Biometric Identification:** The identification of individuals from a distance using biometric data, typically without their knowledge, raising significant privacy concerns.
*Keywords:* remote identification, biometric surveillance, privacy concerns, AI in public spaces.
12. **Social Scoring:** The practice of evaluating individuals based on their behavior, characteristics, or personal attributes, often leading to discriminatory outcomes; explicitly prohibited under the AI Act.
*Keywords:* social credit systems, behavioral scoring, discrimination, AI ethics.
13. **Conformity Assessment:** The process of evaluating whether an AI system complies with the requirements set out in the AI Act, ensuring safety and adherence to legal standards.
*Keywords:* AI compliance testing, regulatory assessment, safety evaluation, AI certification.
14. **Notified Bodies:** Independent organizations designated by EU member states to assess the conformity of certain high-risk AI systems before they are placed on the market.
*Keywords:* conformity assessment bodies, AI regulation authorities, certification organizations, EU compliance.
15. **CE Marking:** A certification mark indicating that an AI system meets EU safety, health, and environmental protection requirements, mandatory for certain products within the European Economic Area.
*Keywords:* EU certification, compliance mark, product safety, European standards.
16. **Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment:** An evaluation required for certain high-risk AI systems to determine their potential impact on fundamental rights and freedoms before deployment.
*Keywords:* human rights assessment, AI ethics evaluation, impact analysis, pre-deployment review.
17. **Human Oversight:** The requirement that high-risk AI systems have mechanisms allowing human intervention and monitoring to prevent or mitigate risks associated with their operation.
*Keywords:* AI supervision, human-in-the-loop, risk mitigation, AI control mechanisms.
18. **Transparency Obligations:** Requirements for AI system providers to disclose information about the system’s capabilities, limitations, and the fact that users are interacting with AI, enhancing trust and informed decision-making.
*Keywords:* AI disclosure, user information, system capabilities, informed consent.
19. **Data Governance:** The management of data availability, usability, integrity, and security in AI systems, ensuring compliance with data protection laws and ethical standards.
*Keywords:* data management, data protection, AI ethics, information governance.
20. **Market Surveillance:** The activities carried out by public authorities to ensure that AI systems on the market comply with the AI Act and do not pose risks to public interest.
Absolutely! Here’s the continuation of the SEO-optimized glossary from the EU AI Act, picking up from term 21:
21. **Regulatory Sandbox:**
A controlled environment set up by authorities to allow AI developers to test innovative technologies under regulatory supervision before full-scale deployment.
*Keywords:* AI testing zone, safe AI innovation, supervised experimentation, regulatory trial.
22. **AI Office:**
A centralized EU body responsible for overseeing the implementation of the AI Act, coordinating enforcement, and guiding member states on compliance.
*Keywords:* AI oversight agency, European AI authority, compliance office, EU governance.
23. **European Artificial Intelligence Board (EAIB):**
A coordinating body of national authorities and the European Commission to ensure harmonized application of the AI Act across the EU.
*Keywords:* AI governance board, EU AI coordination, national authorities, regulatory body.
24. **Providers:**
Entities (often companies) that develop or place AI systems on the market or into service under their name or trademark.
*Keywords:* AI developers, system providers, vendors, AI manufacturers.
25. **Deployers:**
Users of AI systems in a professional or institutional setting—such as companies, schools, or hospitals—who may have legal obligations under the AI Act.
*Keywords:* AI users, professional deployment, system operators, commercial AI application.
26. **Importers:**
Businesses that introduce AI systems from outside the EU into the European market, assuming compliance responsibilities.
*Keywords:* AI importers, EU market entry, compliance obligations, external providers.
27. **Distributors:**
Entities involved in making AI systems available on the EU market without altering them, such as retailers or wholesalers.
*Keywords:* AI resellers, supply chain, product distributors, market access.
28. **Notified Bodies:**
Independent organizations designated to carry out conformity assessments on high-risk AI systems before market access.
*Keywords:* assessment authorities, AI auditors, compliance reviewers, certification experts.
29. **Conformity Assessment Procedures:**
Formal checks and tests applied to high-risk AI systems to ensure compliance with EU standards and the AI Act.
*Keywords:* safety evaluation, EU AI testing, conformity protocols, regulatory checks.
30. **High-Risk Use Cases:**
Specific scenarios (e.g., in recruitment, border control, education) where AI poses significant risk to rights and safety and must meet stricter obligations.
*Keywords:* sensitive AI use, AI risk scenarios, high-risk deployment, regulated use cases.
Here’s the next batch (31–50) of SEO-friendly terms with descriptions from the EU AI Act glossary:
—
31. **Foundation Models:**
Large-scale AI models trained on massive datasets and adaptable for a wide range of tasks (e.g., chatbots, translation, image generation). May fall under stricter rules in the AI Act.
*Keywords:* large AI models, GPT, foundational AI, scalable AI architecture.
32. **Open Source Models:**
AI models released with publicly available code, promoting transparency and innovation. Subject to specific considerations under the AI Act.
*Keywords:* open-source AI, community-developed models, transparent AI, public AI tools.
33. **Risk Categories:**
The AI Act defines four risk tiers: unacceptable, high, limited, and minimal. Obligations increase with higher risk levels.
*Keywords:* AI risk levels, regulatory tiers, AI classification, risk-based approach.
34. **Prohibited AI Practices:**
AI applications banned outright under the Act—such as social scoring, real-time facial recognition in public (except for limited exceptions), or manipulative behavior.
*Keywords:* banned AI, illegal AI use, prohibited technologies, unethical AI.
35. **Transparency Requirements:**
Mandates for AI systems to clearly communicate their artificial nature, especially when interacting with humans.
*Keywords:* explainable AI, user disclosure, algorithm transparency, AI ethics.
36. **Data Quality Requirements:**
Rules ensuring that training, validation, and testing data sets are relevant, representative, and free from bias to prevent harm or discrimination.
*Keywords:* clean data, unbiased training data, ethical AI input, fair datasets.
37. **Quality Management System (QMS):**
A structured framework that providers of high-risk AI must implement to monitor, evaluate, and maintain compliance with the AI Act.
*Keywords:* AI quality assurance, compliance system, risk control, operational standards.
38. **Post-Market Monitoring:**
Ongoing evaluation of AI systems after deployment to detect issues and ensure continuous compliance.
*Keywords:* AI lifecycle, system updates, real-world monitoring, continuous validation.
39. **Technical Documentation:**
Required records detailing an AI system’s design, purpose, performance, and compliance measures—crucial for audits and transparency.
*Keywords:* AI design files, compliance records, system specs, documentation standards.
40. **Fundamental Rights:**
Core EU rights (e.g., privacy, non-discrimination, freedom of expression) that AI systems must respect under the AI Act.
*Keywords:* human rights, digital rights, privacy protection, ethical AI.
41. **Human-Centric AI:**
A guiding principle of the Act, emphasizing that AI should enhance human agency and operate under human control.
*Keywords:* responsible AI, ethical technology, human-first AI, trustworthy systems.
42. **Risk Management System:**
A required strategy for high-risk AI systems to identify, evaluate, and mitigate risks throughout their lifecycle.
*Keywords:* AI safety plan, risk analysis, harm prevention, compliance measures.
43. **European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS):**
The EU authority ensuring that personal data is handled according to GDPR in AI contexts, especially for high-risk applications.
*Keywords:* AI and GDPR, data protection authority, EU privacy regulation, AI oversight.
44. **Personal Data:**
Information that identifies individuals, which AI systems must process according to GDPR rules.
*Keywords:* identifiable data, GDPR compliance, privacy safeguards, data rights.
45. **Machine Learning:**
A subset of AI where systems improve performance by learning from data without explicit programming. Central to many regulated AI systems.
*Keywords:* ML algorithms, training models, data-driven learning, intelligent systems.
46. **Predictive Policing:**
A controversial AI application using historical crime data to predict future criminal activity—flagged as high-risk or prohibited.
*Keywords:* crime prediction AI, surveillance technology, public safety tools, ethical concerns.
47. **Law Enforcement AI:**
AI systems used by police or border agencies, including facial recognition, which are heavily regulated under the AI Act.
*Keywords:* surveillance AI, biometric policing, justice tech, regulated enforcement.
48. **Migration and Border Control AI:**
Systems used to assess visa applications, perform identity verification, or monitor immigration, typically classified as high-risk.
*Keywords:* border AI, immigration tech, automated visa screening, identity AI.
49. **Education and Vocational Training AI:**
AI systems used to assess or influence students, such as exam grading tools, flagged as high-risk due to potential bias and rights impacts.
*Keywords:* edtech AI, automated grading, school AI systems, AI in learning.
50. **Employment and HR AI:**
AI tools used for recruiting, evaluating, or monitoring workers. Subject to high-risk classification because of the potential for discrimination.
*Keywords:* hiring algorithms, workplace AI, job screening AI, fair recruitment.
Continuing with the detailed descriptions and SEO-friendly keywords for each term from the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), starting from term number 51:
51. **Limited Risk AI Systems**
– *Description*: These AI systems present a moderate level of risk and are subject to specific transparency obligations. Providers must ensure that users are informed about the AI nature of the system, enabling informed decisions.
– *Keywords*: Limited risk AI, transparency obligations, user information, moderate risk AI systems.
52. **Low-Risk AI Systems**
– *Description*: AI systems that pose minimal risk to users and society. While not subject to stringent regulatory requirements, providers are encouraged to adhere to voluntary codes of conduct to maintain ethical standards.
– *Keywords*: Low-risk AI, minimal risk AI systems, voluntary codes of conduct, ethical AI practices.
53. **Machine Learning**
– *Description*: A subset of AI involving algorithms that enable systems to learn and improve from experience without explicit programming. Machine learning is foundational to developing adaptive AI applications.
– *Keywords*: Machine learning, AI algorithms, adaptive systems, learning from data.
54. **Market Surveillance**
– *Description*: Activities conducted by authorities to ensure that AI systems on the market comply with applicable regulations, safeguarding public interests such as health, safety, and fundamental rights.
– *Keywords*: Market surveillance, regulatory compliance, AI system monitoring, public safety in AI.
55. **Minimal Risk AI Systems**
– *Description*: AI applications considered to have negligible or no risk, such as spam filters or AI used in video games. These systems are largely unrestricted but may follow voluntary guidelines.
– *Keywords*: Minimal risk AI, negligible risk applications, unrestricted AI systems, voluntary AI guidelines.
56. **Monitoring**
– *Description*: The continuous process of overseeing AI system performance to ensure compliance with regulatory standards and to detect any deviations or risks that may arise during operation.
– *Keywords*: AI system monitoring, performance oversight, compliance tracking, risk detection in AI.
57. **National Competent Authorities**
– *Description*: Designated bodies within EU member states responsible for implementing and enforcing the AI Act, including conducting market surveillance and ensuring compliance with AI regulations.
– *Keywords*: National competent authorities, AI regulation enforcement, member state AI bodies, AI Act implementation.
58. **National Security**
– *Description*: The protection of a nation’s citizens, economy, and institutions. Certain AI applications related to national security may be exempt from specific provisions of the AI Act.
– *Keywords*: National security, AI exemptions, protection of citizens, AI in defense.
59. **Notified Bodies**
– *Description*: Independent organizations designated to assess the conformity of high-risk AI systems with the AI Act’s requirements, ensuring they meet necessary standards before market entry.
– *Keywords*: Notified bodies, conformity assessment, high-risk AI evaluation, AI system certification.
60. **Obligations of Providers**
– *Description*: Duties imposed on AI system providers, including ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements, conducting risk assessments, and maintaining documentation to demonstrate conformity.
– *Keywords*: Provider obligations, AI compliance duties, risk assessment responsibilities, AI documentation requirements.
61. **Open Source Models**
– *Description*: AI models whose source code and, in some cases, training data are publicly available, allowing for use, modification, and distribution by anyone.
– *Keywords*: Open source AI, publicly available models, AI code sharing, collaborative AI development.
62. **Penalties**
– *Description*: Sanctions imposed for non-compliance with the AI Act, which can include fines and other corrective measures to enforce adherence to AI regulations.
– *Keywords*: AI Act penalties, non-compliance fines, regulatory sanctions, enforcement measures.
63. **Personal Data**
– *Description*: Any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person. AI systems processing personal data must comply with data protection regulations to safeguard individual privacy.
– *Keywords*: Personal data, identifiable information, data protection, privacy in AI.
64. **Post-Market Monitoring**
– *Description*: Ongoing surveillance conducted by providers after an AI system has been placed on the market to ensure continuous compliance and to address any emerging risks.
– *Keywords*: Post-market monitoring, AI system surveillance, ongoing compliance, risk management.
65. **Predictive Policing**
– *Description*: The use of AI to analyze data and predict potential criminal activity. Such applications are subject to strict scrutiny under the AI Act due to ethical and fundamental rights considerations.
– *Keywords*: Predictive policing, AI in law enforcement, crime prediction, ethical considerations in AI.
66. **Privacy**
– *Description*: The right of individuals to control their personal information. AI systems must be designed and operated in ways that protect user privacy and comply with relevant data protection laws.
– *Keywords*: Privacy rights, personal information protection, AI data privacy, compliance with data laws.
67. **Prohibited AI Practices**
– *Description*: AI applications that are explicitly banned under the AI Act due to posing unacceptable risks, such as systems that manipulate human behavior or enable social scoring.
– *Keywords*: Prohibited AI practices, unacceptable risk AI, banned AI applications, AI Act restrictions.
68. **Providers**
– *Description*: Entities or individuals that develop or have an AI system developed and place it on the market under their name or trademark, bearing responsibility for compliance with the AI Act.
– *Keywords*: AI providers, system developers, market placement, compliance responsibility.
Sure! Continuing the SEO-friendly, detailed list from term 69 onward:
**69. Public Authorities**
– *Description*: Government bodies—local, regional, or national—that may use, regulate, or be affected by AI systems. Their responsibilities can include procurement, oversight, or enforcement of AI regulation.
– *Keywords*: public authorities in AI, government AI oversight, AI regulation bodies, AI enforcement agencies.
**70. Public Consultation**
– *Description*: A process through which stakeholders and citizens can provide input on proposed AI regulations and frameworks. It ensures democratic participation in shaping AI governance.
– *Keywords*: AI public consultation, stakeholder engagement, citizen input AI, AI policy feedback.
**71. Public Safety**
– *Description*: Ensuring that AI systems do not endanger the public. This includes regulating high-risk AI applications used in critical areas like transportation, law enforcement, and infrastructure.
– *Keywords*: AI and public safety, risk mitigation, AI system safety, safe AI deployment.
**72. Quality Management System (QMS)**
– *Description*: A structured system that providers of high-risk AI must implement to ensure the consistent quality, compliance, and safety of their systems.
– *Keywords*: AI quality management, QMS for AI, AI compliance systems, managing AI quality.
**73. Real-Time Biometric Identification**
– *Description*: Technology that uses biometric data (like facial recognition) in real-time to identify individuals, especially in public spaces. Highly regulated due to privacy and ethical risks.
– *Keywords*: real-time biometric ID, facial recognition AI, biometric surveillance, live biometric monitoring.
**74. Regulatory Sandbox**
– *Description*: A controlled environment where AI developers can test innovative systems under regulatory supervision. Encourages innovation while ensuring safety and compliance.
– *Keywords*: AI sandbox, testing AI systems, regulatory AI testing, innovation-friendly AI policy.
**75. Remote Biometric Identification**
– *Description*: Identifying individuals using biometric data from a distance, often without their knowledge. The AI Act places strict conditions on its use, especially in public areas.
– *Keywords*: remote biometric ID, biometric privacy, facial recognition rules, AI surveillance limits.
**76. Reporting Obligations**
– *Description*: Requirements for AI providers and users to report incidents, malfunctions, or updates related to high-risk systems to authorities. Promotes transparency and accountability.
– *Keywords*: AI incident reporting, compliance obligations, high-risk AI notifications, reporting AI failures.
**77. Risk Assessment**
– *Description*: A systematic process for identifying and evaluating risks associated with an AI system. Required especially for high-risk categories to protect users and fundamental rights.
– *Keywords*: AI risk analysis, risk management, assessing AI systems, AI risk evaluation.
**78. Risk Categories**
– *Description*: Classification of AI systems based on their potential impact—minimal, limited, high, or unacceptable. Determines the level of regulation and oversight applied.
– *Keywords*: AI risk classification, AI system categories, risk-based AI regulation, EU AI levels.
**79. Risk Management System**
– *Description*: A formal set of procedures implemented by providers to identify, monitor, and mitigate risks throughout the lifecycle of a high-risk AI system.
– *Keywords*: AI risk controls, risk management AI, monitoring AI risks, AI system lifecycle safety.
**80. Safety Components**
– *Description*: Elements within AI systems that perform safety-related functions, such as obstacle detection in autonomous vehicles. These components are subject to strict scrutiny.
– *Keywords*: AI safety modules, critical safety functions, AI system components, safe AI design.
**81. Scientific Panel of Independent Experts**
– *Description*: A group of neutral, highly qualified researchers and professionals advising the European Commission and AI Office on technical and ethical issues related to AI.
– *Keywords*: AI expert panel, scientific AI advisors, independent AI ethics board, EU AI guidance.
**82. Sectoral Legislation**
– *Description*: Existing laws and regulations that apply to specific industries (e.g., healthcare, finance), which may intersect or overlap with the AI Act.
– *Keywords*: AI sector laws, industry-specific AI rules, healthcare AI regulation, finance AI compliance.
**83. Self-Assessment**
– *Description*: The process by which providers evaluate their AI system’s conformity with regulatory requirements, typically required for non-critical or medium-risk applications.
– *Keywords*: AI self-assessment, compliance checks, provider risk evaluation, AI audit tools.
**84. Social Scoring**
– *Description*: The controversial use of AI to evaluate or rank individuals based on behavior or characteristics. The AI Act bans such practices due to ethical and rights concerns.
– *Keywords*: AI social scoring, banned AI practices, algorithmic ranking, personal reputation AI.
**85. Stakeholders**
– *Description*: All parties with an interest in AI development and regulation, including governments, developers, users, civil society organizations, and the public.
– *Keywords*: AI stakeholders, AI ecosystem participants, public and private AI roles, collaborative AI policy.
**86. Standardization**
– *Description*: The development of common technical standards to ensure interoperability, quality, and safety in AI systems. Promoted by EU agencies and standard bodies.
– *Keywords*: AI standards, harmonization, standardized AI protocols, EU AI norms.
**87. Standards**
– *Description*: Official documents providing technical specifications and guidelines for AI development and use, often developed by European Standardization Organizations (ESOs).
– *Keywords*: AI technical standards, conformity benchmarks, European AI standards, compliance guidelines.
**88. Supervision Mechanism**
– *Description*: The coordinated system of oversight established under the AI Act to monitor compliance, involving national authorities, the European AI Office, and the European Commission.
– *Keywords*: AI supervision mechanism, regulatory oversight, compliance monitoring AI, EU AI governance.
**89. Systemic Risk**
– *Description*: Risks that arise when general-purpose or foundation AI models could have widespread, significant negative impacts on public health, safety, or democracy if misused or flawed.
– *Keywords*: systemic AI risk, foundational model threats, general-purpose AI risks, AI societal harm.
**90. Technical Documentation**
– *Description*: A comprehensive file maintained by AI providers containing system design details, risk assessments, testing results, and evidence of compliance with the AI Act.
– *Keywords*: AI technical documentation, compliance files, AI system records, regulatory documentation.
**91. Testing and Validation**
– *Description*: Processes for evaluating whether an AI system meets design specifications and safety requirements. Mandatory for high-risk systems before market deployment.
– *Keywords*: AI system testing, AI validation process, regulatory testing AI, pre-market validation.
**92. Third-Party Access**
– *Description*: Conditions under which external entities, including regulators or auditors, may access AI systems or their documentation for inspection or enforcement purposes.
– *Keywords*: AI third-party access, audit access AI, regulatory inspection, external system review.
**93. Traceability**
– *Description*: The ability to track AI system decisions, components, and data sources to ensure transparency, accountability, and root cause analysis in case of failures.
– *Keywords*: AI traceability, system tracking, audit trails AI, transparent AI systems.
**94. Training Data**
– *Description*: The datasets used to train AI models. Must be relevant, representative, and free from bias to ensure fair and effective system performance.
– *Keywords*: AI training data, dataset bias, machine learning inputs, ethical data use.
**95. Transparency Requirements**
– *Description*: Obligations to disclose how AI systems work, including informing users when interacting with AI and explaining automated decisions where appropriate.
– *Keywords*: AI transparency rules, user disclosure AI, explainable AI, transparency compliance.
**96. Trustworthy AI**
– *Description*: AI that adheres to ethical principles such as fairness, accountability, privacy, and human oversight, aiming to build user and societal trust in the technology.
– *Keywords*: trustworthy AI, ethical artificial intelligence, responsible AI design, fair and safe AI.
**97. Unacceptable Risk AI Systems**
– *Description*: AI systems that are outright banned under the AI Act due to their high potential to harm human rights, safety, or democratic processes—like manipulative or social scoring systems.
– *Keywords*: banned AI systems, unacceptable AI risks, prohibited AI, AI harm prevention.
**98. User Obligations**
– *Description*: Duties for entities using AI systems, especially high-risk ones, including monitoring performance, reporting malfunctions, and ensuring proper human oversight.
– *Keywords*: AI user responsibilities, operator obligations, AI deployment rules, user-side compliance.
**99. Voluntary Codes of Conduct**
– *Description*: Non-mandatory guidelines that organizations can adopt to promote ethical and responsible AI development, even when not legally required under the AI Act.
– *Keywords*: AI best practices, voluntary AI ethics, industry guidelines, responsible AI development.
**100. Watermarking (for AI-generated content)**
– *Description*: A technique used to label content produced by AI (e.g., images, text, video) to ensure transparency and prevent misinformation. May be required for foundation models.
– *Keywords*: AI content watermarking, synthetic media labeling, AI-generated transparency, fake content prevention.
✅ Would you like this full list formatted for download (PDF, DOCX, or CSV)? Or maybe styled as a blog/article for publishing or SEO purposes?